How Can America Become A Better Immigrant Nation

How Can America Become a Better Immigrant Nation Again? It has become evident to many that the American economy is declining in recent years. Journalists are pointing out that one of the reasons why it got weaker is due to a failed immigration system and outdated policies towards illegal immigrants. For instance, Fareed Zakaria from Time magazine says, although America was once considered an example to many other immigrant nations, it is now falling behind some of them in terms of immigration-related matters (24). Simply put, it is no longer the best immigrant nation it used to be. However, indicators of being a great immigrant country do not just include its own economic performance or the like, but also how it relates to other†¦show more content†¦On the other hand, Korman stated that the annual limit for low-skill work visa is only a few thousands compared to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistic’s finding that the country is also expecting millions of low-sk ill job vacancies in the coming decade. He claims illegal immigration is on the rise in the United States lately because such small number of visas for low-skill labor results an illegal market to offset the high demand (60). For a more efficient economy and stronger immigration system, America is required to discourage illegal immigration and encourage legal procedures by implementing proper policies and regulations towards alien labor force. An apparent need here is to increase the limits set for issuing both high-skill and low-skill visas as a foremost measure to boost its legal immigration. As a result, the illegal workforce can also diminish and the economy will improve. Besides dealing with the issues concerning temporary visas for the immigrant workforce, the United States needs to adopt more effective immigration laws and policies towards retaining or sending back immigrants to fix the broken system. Korman claims the future for the millions of undocumented immigrants that a re already here remains uncertain, while Professor Paul Collier at Oxford University mentions that liberals like Zuckerberg would say justice has not been served equally to them (60; 30). Whether people should be allowed to pursue legal status for a longerShow MoreRelatedThe Land Of Opportunity : Immigrants1509 Words   |  7 PagesThe Land of Opportunity Immigrants created America, a nation that has embraced immigration. Throughout the years, America developed its â€Å"American Dream† concept, which states that anyone can succeed in the United States as long as that person works hard and does gives up. That concept, hope or dream attracts thousands of individuals, many of which leave their native countries with their hearth full of hope and the illusion of reaching and living the â€Å"American Dream.† However, the wonderful dreamRead MoreImmigration Of The United States847 Words   |  4 Pagesare count more than 1 million, without including unauthorized immigrants. Many Americans who believed too much immigration in America could become a problem. For the fact that if America’s immigration rate continues grow, like now, by 2050’s the minority groups collectively will constitute the majority of Americans now. Some interest groups believe that the white majority will no longer be the dominate culture, m oreover, new immigrants may take jobs away from American workers and eventually alterRead MoreU.s. Immigration Today s Economic Stability1436 Words   |  6 Pageswall- and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me- and I’ll build them very inexpensively on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words†-Donald Trump. Whether the United States builds a wall, deports hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, or does nothing about it, the so called â€Å"uncontrollable problem† of immigration is still present today. America, for the past 100 years, has been faced with this dilemma that immigrants come and pursue the American dreamRead MoreImmigration, The Land Of Opportunity For People1478 Words   |  6 Pagesimmigration has shaped America into who she is today. July 4, 1776, was the day immigrants first stepped onto North American soil and claimed the land as theirs. The impact of migration on a country this big canâ€℠¢t be ignored, especially because the people coming to live in America are usually from Third World countries and are looking for employment and to be shown a better way a life. Like anything else, there are both huge pros and cons to Third World immigration. Once, America was known as the landRead MoreThe Undocumented Teenagers And Future Generation Of Children1003 Words   |  5 Pages13% of the United States populations is made up by immigrants. About 11 million are undocumented out of the 40 million foreign-born in the United States. For years, the inherent dignity of undocumented immigrants has been under attack. These attacks are supported by incorrect, misleading statements aiming to dehumanize and belittle an entire group of people (JUST THE FACTS†). I tremendously believe many of the undocumented teenagers and future generation of children will have a positive impact onRead MoreThe Importance Of Immigrants In America1230 Words   |  5 PagesAmerica is a land of opp ortunities and is known to be the melting pot made up of immigrants. With an increase of immigrants there’s a fear among natives that immigrants will steal their job. However, immigrants do not steal their job, instead they create them. In addition Immigrants cause economic growth and are beneficial in our nation. They also affect policy making and labor policies such as discrimination and wages. Many immigrants come to America for better opportunities and a better lifeRead MoreAmerica Has Always Been Labelled As A Melting Pot Due To1264 Words   |  6 PagesAmerica has always been labelled as a melting pot due to the diversity in our population. People from all over the world have traveled here to have a chance at the â€Å"American Dream†. Many people have varied reasons for coming to our country but some must leave their home country to find work, or because they have such awful living conditions. In recent years, it has become an impossible feat to obtain full citizenship in our nation, which can be good and very discouraging to immigrants trying to betterRead MoreEssay on Opposition to Immigration in 19th and 20th Century America1127 Words   |  5 Pages20th Century America During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many American nativist groups opposed free unrestricted immigration. Although racism is a main reason, there were many others. Economic, political, social and moral standards seemed to be threatened by these newcomers. The immigrants were unfamiliar of the language and customs that we take for granted in our everyday lives. The fear that gripped the nation was why people reacted so strongly against immigrants. The peopleRead MoreThe United States Is Immensively A Land Of Immigrants1333 Words   |  6 PagesThe United States is immensively a land of immigrants. Whilst tons of arriving immigrants have sameness in their experiences, there is a great significance in the differences: some fled for economic reasons whereas others fled for political or religious persecution. Native Americans [Indians] became the first people to live in the Americas, followed by European and African groups. Because of war and failed revolutions, many Germans massively migrated; and during this period, large numbers of ChineseRead More English Should be the National Language Essay1004 Words   |  5 PagesFrom the time the Pilgrims landed in this great nation at Plymouth Rock, immigrants have been culturally diverse and have spoken many languages. When the Pilgrims arrived in the New World, they did not know how to communicate with the natives. Through intense study the natives learned the Pilgrims’ language. Even with the common language they were still a melting pot of different culture. Some would say that America has gotten over the language/ cultural barriers and now almost everyone speaks the

Freedom to Love Essays - 1088 Words

There are different kinds of partners in the world: Black, White, Asian, Straight, Gay, etc. However, not all of them are accepted by the society. Holding someone’s hand in public? It may be the sweetest, most innocent and natural of gesture of affection. However, when it comes to a couple with the same sex, things become completely different. People may think it is disgusting. Therefore, gay couples have to tolerate others’ disgust looks and nasty words, or sometimes even worse -- a punch. The topic of whether we should support homosexuality has become more and more controversial in recent years. Although it seems like an awkward topic to write with, I still believe people should change their opinions on homosexuals. They do nothing†¦show more content†¦Let’s round up the gays. Let’s round up the blacks. I mean, it starts with that.†(Herszenhorn 2) We can call people who killed Jews totalitarians; we can call people who have prejudices on b lack racialists; however, how can we call those people who have a bias towards homosexuals? Why are the government dictating what two people can or cannot do when nobody is hurt in the process? Nowadays, a large number of gay girls, boys, women, and men choose to remain hidden to society due to fear and personally internalized homophobia. However, falling in love with a same-sex person is not their fault. The fact is that we were not able to determine the seeds of who we were to become. We had no choice about many aspects of our new body and mind, including our sexual orientation. Therefore, government should not put regulations on human nature. Instead, we must offer a sympathetic ear to the pains and genuine struggles of homosexuals. Speaking of the government, I believe it is also not reasonable to make same-sex marriage illegal. Why should the governments have the right to decide who can get married and who cannot? Marriage is a â€Å"long-held, established civil institution ba sed upon cultural expectations of long-term committed monogamy and mutual respect between two non- related adults participating in a mutually consensual, intimate relationship.†(Homosexuality 1) It is a basic human right and an individual personal choice andShow MoreRelatedWhat Is Freedom For Love? Essay746 Words   |  3 PagesWhat is Freedom to Love? Some would say that freedom to love is, having no limitations or boundaries. To see everyone equally. Many would say that freedom to love is, to give ones life for another. I agree with both statements but I would go further to say that freedom to love is not only an act or a response but it is a lifestyle. Something that defines you. Something that make you, who you are. As proud Americans, this month we celebrate the freedom that we have in this country and theRead More Love and Freedom Essay3686 Words   |  15 PagesLove and Freedom What is love? Is it something we do or something we can know? Some classify love as something that you feel for some people sometimes. It is often linked or used interchangeably with lust. Others feel that it is something that is constant and untouched by judgement and feeling. The only common denominator for love is that it is something that is desirable; it is something that we want. So what do people want? Many philosophies pose answers; but those answers frequentlyRead MoreThe Theme Of Love And Freedom In Kindred1026 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Better to die fighting for freedom then be a prisoner all the days of your life† (Bob Marley). It all begins with Dana Franklin and everything she has to do in order to both save her ancestry as well as keep love and freedom in her life. It is 1976 in Maryland and Dana Franklin is a black woman married to a white man named Kevin Franklin. One day after moving houses, Dana begins to feel dizzy and faints. When she wakes, s he realizes she is no longer in 1976 and must save a boy, Rufus WeylinRead MoreThe Freedom Of The Free Love Movement Essay1582 Words   |  7 Pages Sexuality no longer held strong ties to procreation and soon sex became more for pleasure. Furthermore, women now had some choice of whether/when they wanted to have children. The free love movement was one of the many social groups that challenged the sexual ideologies of their time. However, free love holds great significance in that their message soon became the â€Å"middle-class sexual ideology† (D’Emilio 165). Their message was that â€Å"neither church nor state should limit the expression of sexualRead MoreThemes Of Love And Freedom In World Literature837 Words   |  4 PagesLove and freedom! Where do Love and Freedom show up in the same place? They come together as themes in World Literature. World Literature is the diverse variety of genres in books that have been spread worldwide and have become well known. It is important to know about these two themes to share and understand everyones unique perspectives. The large collection of striking viewpoints creates many diverse and intriguing themes. Two of the biggest themes that can be found in books are Love and FreedomRead More1984: Love and Freedom Can Be Crushed860 Words    |  4 Pagesby the Party. At first he resists but when faced with torture, Winston immediately betrays his lover, Julia. He surrenders and accepts the Party’s rule, gaining a love for Big Brother. Ultimately, he gives up his fight for freedom and his love for Julia. Throughout the novel 1984, Orwell examines the relationship between love and freedom. In doing so, he suggests that they cannot survive in a repressive society, and attempting to fight it is a useless struggle. Towards the beginning of the novelRead MoreAmericans love freedom we love money we love capitalism. Capitalism is most definitely an1200 Words   |  5 PagesAmericans love freedom; we love money; we love capitalism. Capitalism is most definitely an element of dominant culture amongst the citizens of the United States. In American culture it is easy to see that many of our institutions, including public schools, indoctrinate the children whom they serve with a common American idealism: capitalism is good, communism is bad. Being a citizen of the United States and not being a capitalist is verging upon the fringe of an unwritten taboo. If there isRead MoreEssay about Jane Eyre: The Freedom of Love1842 Words   |  8 PagesParallel to many of the great feministic novels throughout literary history, Jane Eyre is a story about the quest for authentic love. However, Jane Eyre is unique and separate from other romantic pieces, in that it is also about a woman searching for a sense of self-worth through achieving a degree of independence. Orphaned and dismissed at an early age, Jane was born into a modest lifestyle that was characterized by a form of oppressive servitude of which she had no autonomy. She was busy spendingRead MoreSexual Love And The Freedom And Happiness Shared By Two Lovers Essay823 Words   |  4 PagesThe Song portrays the virtue of sexual love and the freedom and happiness shared by two lovers. The Song speaks of a sexual love between man and woman who stands equally before each other in the privacy of their intimacy with no consciousness of the hierarchies of their public world. Equal standing in its most encompassing meaning—neither one is superior nor inferior, but equally ready to initiate and invite, equally desiring and eager to please and be pleased, both transparent about fantasies andRead MoreEssay about Finding the Balance of Love and Freedom in Jane Eyre1339 Words   |  6 PagesSimilar to many of the great feministic novels of its time, Jane Eyre purely emerges as a story focused on the quest for love. The novel’s protagonist, Jane, searches not only for the romantic side of love, but ultimately for a sense of self-worth and independence. Set in the overlapping times of the Victorian and Gothic periods, the novel touches upon both women’s supposed rights, and their inner struggle for liberty. Orphaned at an early age, Jane was born into a modest lifestyle, without any major

Fundamental of Law Product or Service

Question: Discuss about the Fundamental of Law for Product or Service. Answer: Introduction: It is not a valid contract as avalid contractis a written or expressed agreement between two parties to provide a product or service. There are essentially six elements of acontractthat make it a legal and binding document. An offer is an expression of readiness to do something which, if followed by the unconditional acceptance of another person (see item (iii)), results in a contract. An offer (unlike a solicitation) is a clear indication of the offeror's willingness to enter into an agreement under specified terms, and is made in a manner that a reasonable person would understand its acceptance will result in a binding contractFor example, if a company tells you that it will sell you 100 boxes of red wine at the price of $100,000, that company is making you an offer. Acceptance occurs when an offeree agrees to be mutually bound to the terms of the contract by giving consideration, or something of value like money, to seal the deal.There is no contract unless and until the offer is accepted by the person to whom the offer is addressed (sometimes called "the offered"). criminal law, intent is one of three general classes of mens rea necessary to constitute a conventional, as opposed to strict liability, crime. A more formal, generally synonymous legal term is scienterAcceptance is normally made orally or in writing, but if the contract allows that the acceptance and performance of contractual duties are to be carried out simultaneously, then acceptance can also be made by conduct. For example, when a supplier receives your cheese, that supplier may immediately deliver the goods to you without saying or writing anything (Hg.org, 2005) It is not valid as there was no proper offer and acceptance as Stein clearly disagreed that he wont be giving an offer. Mutuality is the consent by both parties to a contract to pay, yield, or give up something in return for the benefits received. The capacity of natural and juridical persons, and legal persons in general, determin es whether they may make binding amendments to their rights, duties and obligations, such as getting married or merging, entering into contracts, making gifts, or writing a valid will. To constitute a valid contract there must be meeting of minds and parties should agree to same things at same point of time. When a person makes an offer/ proposal, he signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing something, o Offer must be given with an intention to create a legal relationship, o There is a clear cut difference between offer and invitation to make an offer, Expression of Opinion, Preliminary Negotiations etc. are not offers, o Offer must be definite, o Offer must be communicated, o Mere statement of price of a piece is not an offer. When a person made a proposal to another and the proposal is assented there to, it is called acceptance, o Voluntary act by the Offered that shows assent to terms of original offer, o Mirror Image Rule: o Offered must unequivocally a ccept offer (Trainagents.com, 2010). If it is valid contract then Doe would not be allowed to work for anybody and he would work for Stein. When two parties make a contract and one breaches it, there are generally two types of remedies that are available to the non-breaching party: equitable remedies and legal remedies. Each type has several subtypes of remedies that may be available. Equitable Remedies Equitable remedies are those that are imposed when money damages would not adequately cure the non-breaching party. The following types of equitable remedies may beavailableinthegivencase: Specific Performance Specific performance is an order by the court that requires the breaching party to carry out the contract as it was originally written. This type of remedy is rare. However, it may be ordered in certain circumstances For example, specific performance may be imposed when the subject matter is unique, such as a famous painting or a specific piece of property. Courts are hesitant to order specific performance because it requires the ongoing monitoring by the court of the contract. Chattel Mortgage : Chattel mortgage, sometimes abbreviatedCM, is the legal term for a type of loan contract used in somestateswith legal systems derived fromEnglish law. Under a typicalchattelmortgage, the purchaser borrows funds for the purchase of movable personal property (the chattel) from the lender. The lender then secures the loan with a mortgage over the chattel. Legal ownership of the chattel is transferred to the purchaser at the time of purchase, and the mortgage is removed once the loan has been repaid. InAustralia, chattel mortgages are commonly used bycompanies,partnershipsandsole tradersto fund the purchase ofcars,commercial vehiclesand other business equipment. perfection: In law,perfectionrelates to the additional steps required to be taken in relation to asecurity interestin order to make it effective against third parties]or to retain its effectiveness in the event of default by the grantor of the security interest. Generally speaking, once a security interest is effectively created, it gives certain rights to the holder of the security and imposes duties on the party who grants that security.However, in many legal systems, additional steps - perfection of the security interest- are required to enforce the security against third parties such as aliquidator. There are three principal modes by which a security interest may be perfected (which method of perfection is applicable depends upon the nature of the security interest and the laws of the relevant country). possession of thecollateral; statutory registration or filing; and notice to the debtor or a fund holder. Fixture: To understand the definition of fixtures, it is first important to comprehend the basics of classification. Almost every thing fits into one of two categories of property: real and personal. Real property includes land and, typically, items that are affixed to land, such as buildings and other improvements. In some jurisdictions the nature of the attachment is specifically described. For example, Cal. Civ. Code 660 provides: A thing is deemed to be affixed to land when it is attached to it by roots, as in the case of trees, vines, or shrubs; or imbedded in it, as in the case of walls; or permanently resting upon it, as in the case of buildings; or permanently attached to what is thus permanent, as by means of cement (Morris, 2010)Fixtures fall somewhere between personal property and real property, but, generally, once a fixture is attached to real estate it is considered real property. Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Article 9) defines fixtures as goods that have become so related to particular real property that an interest in them arises under real property law. U.C.C. 9-102(a)(41). Blacks Law Dictionary 713 (9th ed. 2009) defines a fixture as personal property that is attached to land or a building and that is regarded as an irremovable part of the real property, such as a fireplace built into a home. Torrens: Torrens title system is a system of land registration in which clear title is established with a governmental authority that issues title certificates to owners. It is a method of registering titles to real estate. Real estate that is recorded using this method is also called registered property or Torrens property. The system was formulated in 1858 by Sir Robert R. Torrens, the then colonial Premier of South Australia to combat the problems of uncertainty, complexity and cost associated with old system title. The first U.S. Torrens system was enacted by Illinois in 1897. In a Torrens system, a court or bureau of registration operates the system, with an examiner of titles and a registrar as the key officers. The landowner files a petition with the registrar to have the land registered. The examiner of titles reviews the legal history of the land to determine if good title exists. The registrar issues a certificate of title to the owner if good title exist. This certificate is conclusive as to the person's rights in the property and cannot be challenged or overcome by a court of law. The drawback of the system is the initial cost of registering a property. The system is most effective when land is subdivided for the first time because it reduces the number of deed entries an examiner reviews. References Hg,org. (2005).Breach of contract. Retrieved 03 Jan 2017 from https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=20711 Morris. S (2010).Fixtures. Retrieved 03 Jan 2017 from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/probate_property_magazine/rppt_publications_magazine_2010_so_pp_SeptOct10_Morris.authcheckdam.pdf Train agents (2010).Valid contract. Retrieved 03 Jan 2017 from https://www.trainagents.com/DesktopModules/EngageCampus/CourseContent.aspx?ModuleType=StudentMyCoursesCrsPageType=TopicCourseRecordID=107LessonRecordID=1372TopicRecordID=24861Demo=True

Mills Utilitarianism Essays (1326 words) - Utilitarianism

Mill's Utilitarianism Mill's Utilitarianism When faced with a moral dilemma, utilitarianism identifies the appropriate considerations, but offers no realistic way to gather the necessary information to make the required calculations. This lack of information is a problem both in evaluating the welfare issues and in evaluating the consequentialist issues which utilitarianism requires be weighed when making moral decisions. Utilitarianism attempts to solve both of these difficulties by appealing to experience; however, no method of reconciling an individual decision with the rules of experience is suggested, and no relative weights are assigned to the various considerations. In deciding whether or not to torture a terrorist who has planted a bomb in New York City, a utilitarian must evaluate both the overall welfare of the people involved or effected by the action taken, and the consequences of the action taken. To calculate the welfare of the people involved in or effected by an action, utilitarianism requ ires that all individuals be considered equally. Quantitative utilitarians would weigh the pleasure and pain which would be caused by the bomb exploding against the pleasureand pain that would be caused by torturing the terrorist. Then, the amounts would be summed and compared. The problem with this method is that it is impossible to know beforehand how much pain would be caused by the bomb exploding or how much pain would be caused by the torture. Utilitarianism offers no practical way to make the interpersonal comparison of utility necessary to compare the pains. In the case of the bomb exploding, it at least seems highly probable that a greater amount of pain would be caused, at least in the present, by the bomb exploding. This probability suffices for a quantitative utilitarian, but it does not account for the consequences, which create an entirely different problem, which will be discussed below. The probability also does not hold for Mill's utilitarianism. Mill's Utilitarianis m insists on qualitative utilitarianism, which requires that one consider not only the amount of pain or pleasure, but also the quality of such pain and pleasure. Mill suggests that to distinguish between different pains and pleasures we should ask people who have experienced both types which is more pleasurable or more painful. This solution does not work for the question of torture compared to death in an explosion. There is no one who has experienced both, therefore, there is no one who can be consulted. Even if we agree that the pain caused by the number of deaths in the explosion is greater than the pain of the terrorist being tortured, this assessment only accounts for the welfare half of the utilitarian's considerations. Furthermore, one has no way to measure how much more pain is caused by allowing the bomb to explode than by torturing the terrorist. After settling the issues surrounding the welfare, a utilitarian must also consider the consequences of an action. In weighing the consequences, there are two important considerations. The first, which is especially important to objectivist Utilitarianism, is which people will be killed. The second is the precedent which will be set by the action. Unfortunately for the decision maker, the information necessary to make either of these calculations is unavailable. There is no way to determine which people will be killed and weigh whether their deaths would be good for society. Utilitarianism requires that one compare the good that the people would do for society with the harm they would do society if they were not killed. For example, if a young Adolf Hitler were in the building, it might do more good for society to allow the building to explode. Unfortunately for an individual attempting to use utilitarianism to make for decisions, there is no way to know beforehand what a person will do. Furthermore, without even knowing which building the bomb is in, there is no way to predict which people will surely be in the building. A subjectivist utilitarian would dismiss this consideration and would examine only what a rational person would consider to be the consequence; however, even the subjectivist utilitarian must face the question of precedent setting. Utilitarianism considers justice and humane treatment to be good for society as a whole and therefore instrumentally good as a